The Academy's digital research platforms — applying evidence-based methods, structured data and AI to advance the Chinese medical sciences.
The Academy builds and maintains its own digital research platforms, structuring traditional and native materia medica knowledge and applying AI and real-world data to support evidence-informed research — the working foundation of our research programme in AI & Data Science in Chinese Medicine. Each platform below is itself a concrete research output, reflected in its data structures, verification methods and evidence synthesis approach.
A structured, searchable knowledge base of 100+ Australian native materia medica entities — botanical and zoological identities, Latin nomenclature, traditional and contemporary uses, and safety annotations.
Visit AMMKB →A dual-perspective regulatory index for Chinese herbs in Australia — practitioner dispensing and product/import views, anchored to SUSMP scheduling, with source-verified entries signed off by named reviewers.
Currently in open expert review. Not regulatory or compliance advice.
Visit ARCH →A clinical research workbench combining AI-assisted pattern-differentiation suggestions, structured real-world data capture and outcome follow-up, supporting evidence generation in routine practice.
For registered practitioners engaged in Academy research programmes.
Practitioner Login →A structured index of TGA market actions — recalls, product alerts and corrections — involving Chinese medicine products in Australia, compiled from official records and cross-referenced to the Academy's herb-level regulatory index.
Browse the index →A searchable index of the WHO ICD-11 Chapter 26 (Traditional Medicine Conditions, Module I) — 346 coded disorders and patterns with official WHO codes, English names, Chinese terms and definitions, being cross-referenced to Australian practice usage.
Browse the index →A condition × intervention evidence map covering 26 clinical indications. Each cell links to a source systematic review with its DOI; GRADE certainty is cited from the source review, not self-assigned. Currently in open expert review.
Browse the map →A structured record of master-disciple lineages and academic schools in Chinese medicine, tracing transmission threads to their documented origins in China and abroad; every relationship is verified against primary literature. (Content in Chinese)
Browse the archive →For research findings published as citable, permanently referenced documents, see our Research Reports.